Skip to content

20. hitāhitīyādhyāyaḥ

Adhikarana 1 (1-2) · Śloka 2

athātō hitāhitīyamadhyāyaṁ vyākhyāsyāmaḥ ||1|| yathōvāca bhagavān dhanvantariḥ ||2||

View original

अथातो हिताहितीयमध्यायं व्याख्यास्यामः ||१|| यथोवाच भगवान् धन्वन्तरिः ||२||

Meaning of the śloka

Now the chapter concerning what is beneficial and harmful will be explained, as taught by Bhagavan Dhanvantari.

🔊 Audio coming soon

Hide commentary

athāta ityādi| hitāhitānyadhikr̥tya kr̥tō'dhyāyō hitāhitāni vā'smin vidyanta iti hitāhitīyaḥ||1-2||

Meaning of the commentary

The chapter is called Hitahitiya because it is composed with beneficial and harmful things as its subject, or because such things are contained in it.

Key terms

hita-ahita
What is beneficial and what is harmful in the dietary and behavioural classifications of this chapter.

Adhikarana 2 (3) · Śloka 3

yadvāyōḥ pathyaṁ tat pittasyāpathyamityanēna hētunā na kiñciddravyamēkāntēna hitamahitaṁ vā'stīti kēcidācāryā bruvatē | tattu na samyak; iha khalu yasmāddravyāṇi svabhāvataḥ saṁyōgataścaikāntahitānyēkāntāhitāni hitāhitāni ca bhavanti ||3||

View original

यद्वायोः पथ्यं तत् पित्तस्यापथ्यमित्यनेन हेतुना न किञ्चिद्द्रव्यमेकान्तेन हितमहितं वाऽस्तीति केचिदाचार्या ब्रुवते | तत्तु न सम्यक्; इह खलु यस्माद्द्रव्याणि स्वभावतः संयोगतश्चैकान्तहितान्येकान्ताहितानि हिताहितानि च भवन्ति ||३||

Meaning of the śloka

Some teachers say that nothing is invariably beneficial or harmful, reasoning that what is suitable for vata may be unsuitable for pitta. The text rejects this as incomplete. It holds that substances, through their inherent nature and through combination, can be invariably beneficial, invariably harmful, or beneficial in one context and harmful in another.

🔊 Audio coming soon

Hide commentary

prathamaṁ paramatamēva darśayannāha- yadvāyōḥ pathyamityādi| yadvāyōḥ pathyaṁ tat pittasyāpathyamiti tailakāñjikamityādi| itiśabdō'yamādyarthaḥ| ēkāntēna sātatyēna kiñcidapi dravyaṁ hitaṁ nāsti, pittasyāpathyatvāt; tathaikāntēnāhitamapi nāsti, vāyōḥ pathyatvāt| vāśabdō'tra samuccayārthaḥ| paramataniṣēdhārthaṁ svamatamāha- tattvityādi| ihēti sauśrutē tantrē| khalu niścayēna| svabhāvataḥ prakr̥titaḥ; yā sarvāvasthāsvaparityājyā sā dravyasya prakr̥tiḥ; yathā- vahnēruṣṇatvam, apāṁ dravatvamityādi| saṁyōgata iti saṁyōgaḥ ēkadvitryādidravyēṇa saṁhatībhāvaḥ| cakārēṇa saṁyōgēṣvapi svabhāvō'pi hētutvēna samuccīyatē, tathā dēśakālamātrāsaṁskārāśca svabhāvānusambaddhāḥ samuccīyantē||3||

Meaning of the commentary

The commentary first presents the opposing view. Sesame oil and kanjika are examples of things described as suitable for vata but unsuitable for pitta. In that view, no substance is continuously beneficial because it may be unsuitable for pitta, and none continuously harmful because it may suit vata. The conjunction translated as or in the source is explained as including both possibilities. The text then states its own position within the Sushruta tradition. Svabhava is a thing's persistent inherent nature, illustrated by heat in fire and fluidity in water. Samyoga is conjunction with one, two, three or more substances. The conjunction in the statement also includes inherent nature operating within combinations, together with place, time, quantity and processing insofar as these are connected with that nature.

Key terms

svabhAva (svabhava)
A substance's inherent and persistent nature, treated as one basis of its effect.
saMyoga (samyoga)
Combination or conjunction with one or more other substances.

Adhikarana 3 (4) · Śloka 4

tatra ,ēkāntahitāni jātisātmyāt salilaghr̥tadugdhaudanaprabhr̥tīni; ēkāntāhitāni tu dahanapacanamāraṇādiṣu pravr̥ttānyanalakṣāraviṣādīni, saṁyōgādaparāṇi viṣatulyāni bhavanti; hitāhitāni tu yadvāyōḥ pathyaṁ tat pittasyāpathyamiti ||4||

View original

तत्र ,एकान्तहितानि जातिसात्म्यात् सलिलघृतदुग्धौदनप्रभृतीनि; एकान्ताहितानि तु दहनपचनमारणादिषु प्रवृत्तान्यनलक्षारविषादीनि, संयोगादपराणि विषतुल्यानि भवन्ति; हिताहितानि तु यद्वायोः पथ्यं तत् पित्तस्यापथ्यमिति ||४||

Meaning of the śloka

Among these, water, ghee, milk, cooked rice and similar substances are classed as invariably beneficial because they are congenial to the human species. Fire, alkali, poison and similar things used for burning, digestion or destruction are classed as invariably harmful. Other things become comparable to poison through combination. Context-dependent things are illustrated by what is suitable for vata being unsuitable for pitta.

🔊 Audio coming soon

Hide commentary

ēkāntahitānyēva prathamaṁ darśayannāha- tatraikāntahitānītyādi| tatrēti hitāhitadravyēṣu madhyē| jātisātmyāditi manuṣyajātisātmyāt| ātmanā dēhēna saha sthitaṁ dravyamavikāri sātmyaṁ; yaduktaṁ- “ātmā yahyabhimatō dēha ātmanā saha yat sthitam| na kuryādvikr̥tiṁ dravyamupayuktaṁ kathañcana|| sātmyamityucyatē tattu” iti| prabhr̥tigrahaṇādyavagōdhūmādayaḥ| ēkāntāhitāni darśayannāha- ēkāntāhitānītyādi| ētānyagnikṣāraviṣādīnyēkāntāhitāni svasthānāṁ, rōgiṇāṁ tu rōgamātrādyapēkṣayā hitānyēvēti| saṁyōgādityādi| anyē tvēvaṁ paṭhanti- ‘tēṣāmēva saṁyōgatastvaparāṇi’ iti, vyākhyānayanti ca- ēkāntāhitānīti sambadhyatē, tuśabdaścārthaḥ; tēna svabhāvasaṁyōgānuṣaktairdēśādibhirapyēkāntāhitāni bhavanti| hitāhitāni darśayannāha- hitāhitāni tvityādi| asyārthaḥ prāgēvātraivādhyāyē vyākhyātaḥ||4||

Meaning of the commentary

Congeniality to the species means suitability to human beings. A cited definition calls a substance satmya when it remains compatible with the body and does not produce disturbance when used. The inclusive phrase after cooked rice covers barley, wheat and similar foods. Fire, alkali and poison are invariably harmful to healthy people, though for a patient they may be beneficial when selected according to the disease, dose and related considerations. Some read that other substances become harmful through combination with those same harmful things. On that interpretation, inherent nature, combination, place and the other associated factors can make them invariably harmful. The category beneficial and harmful has already been illustrated by the difference between vata and pitta suitability.

Key terms

jAtisAtmya (jatisatmya)
Congeniality or compatibility attributed to the human species as a whole.
ekAntahita (ekantahita)
Classified by the source as invariably or consistently beneficial.
ekAntAhita (ekantahita)
Classified by the source as invariably harmful, with clinical context acknowledged in the commentary.

Adhikarana 4 (5) · Śloka 5

ataḥ sarvaprāṇināmayamāhārārthaṁ varga upadiśyatē; tadyathā- raktaśāliṣaṣṭikakaṅgukramukundakapāṇḍukapītakapramōdakakālakāsanakapuṣpakakardamakaśakunāhr̥tasugandhakakalama- nīvārakōdravōddālakaśyāmākagōdhūmayavavaiṇavaiṇahariṇakuraṅgamr̥gamātr̥kāśvadaṁṣṭrākarālakrakarakapōtalāvatittirikapiñjalavartīravartikā mudgavanamudgamakuṣṭhakalāyamasūramaṅgalyacaṇakaharēṇvāḍhakīsatīnāścillivāstukasuniṣaṇṇakajīvantītaṇḍulīyakamaṇḍūkaparṇyaḥ, gavyaṁ ghr̥taṁ, saindhavaṁ, dāḍimāmalakamityēṣa vargaḥ sarvaprāṇināṁ sāmānyataḥ pathyatamaḥ ||5||

View original

अतः सर्वप्राणिनामयमाहारार्थं वर्ग उपदिश्यते; तद्यथा- रक्तशालिषष्टिककङ्गुक्रमुकुन्दकपाण्डुकपीतकप्रमोदककालकासनकपुष्पककर्दमकशकुनाहृतसुगन्धककलम- नीवारकोद्रवोद्दालकश्यामाकगोधूमयववैणवैणहरिणकुरङ्गमृगमातृकाश्वदंष्ट्राकरालक्रकरकपोतलावतित्तिरिकपिञ्जलवर्तीरवर्तिका मुद्गवनमुद्गमकुष्ठकलायमसूरमङ्गल्यचणकहरेण्वाढकीसतीनाश्चिल्लिवास्तुकसुनिषण्णकजीवन्तीतण्डुलीयकमण्डूकपर्ण्यः, गव्यं घृतं, सैन्धवं, दाडिमामलकमित्येष वर्गः सर्वप्राणिनां सामान्यतः पथ्यतमः ||५||

Meaning of the śloka

A dietary group described as generally most suitable for all living beings is now taught. It includes red shali and the named varieties shashtika, kanguka, mukundaka, panduka, pitaka, pramodaka, kalaka, asanaka, pushpaka, kardamaka, shakunahrita, sugandhaka and kalama; nivara, kodrava, uddalaka, shyamaka, wheat, barley and bamboo grain; meat of ena, harina, kuranga, mrigamatrika, shvadamshtra and karala; the birds krakara, kapota, lava, tittiri, kapinjala, vartira and vartika; mudga, wild mudga, makushthaka, kalaya, masura, mangalya, chanaka, harenu, adhaki and satina; the greens chilli, vastuka, sunishannaka, jivanti, tanduliyaka and mandukaparni; cow ghee, saindhava salt, pomegranate and amalaki.

🔊 Audio coming soon

Hide commentary

ata ityādi| raktaśāliḥ svanāmnā prasiddhaḥ| ṣaṣṭikō gauraṣaṣṭikaḥ| kaṅgukō gaurakr̥ṣṇaṣaṣṭikaḥ| mukundakaḥ kr̥ṣṇaṣaṣṭikaḥ| pāṇḍukaḥ pāṇḍukaśāliḥ, sa ca pāṇḍutuṣayuktaḥ| sugandhakō dēvaśāliḥ| kalamaḥ śāliviśēṣaḥ, ‘kalāviḥ’ iti lōkē prasiddhaḥ| ētē ṣaṣṭikādayaḥ śūkadhānyēṣu| nīvāraḥ prasādi(ti)kādhānyamadhyē raktaśūkō bhavati, ‘tulajīdhānyam’ iti lōkē prasiddhaḥ| uddālaka āraṇyakōdravaḥ| vaiṇavō vēṇuyavaḥ| nīvārādayastu kudhānyēṣu| ēṇaḥ kr̥ṣṇamr̥gaḥ| hariṇastāmravarṇō mr̥gaḥ| kuraṅgaḥ ‘caturaṅga’ iti lōkē prasiddhaḥ| mr̥gamātr̥kā svalpā pr̥thūdarā caturaṅgastrī| śvadaṁṣṭrā caturdaṁṣṭrō'tiduṣṭaḥ, ‘karkaṭaka’ iti lōkē| karālaḥ kastūrīmr̥gaḥ| tittiriḥ kr̥ṣṇatittiriḥ| kapiñjalō gauratittiriḥ| vartīraḥ ‘gharghara’ iti lōkē; vartikā tadbhēdaḥ| ēṇādayō jāṅgalamr̥gamāṁsēṣu| lāvādayō jāṅgalapakṣiṣu| maṅgalyāḥ pāṇḍuvarṇā masūrāḥ| harēṇuḥ satīnabhēdō vartulakalāyaḥ| āḍhakī tuvarī| satīnō vartulakaḥ| mudgādayō vaidalasūpyēṣu| cillī kṣētravāstukaḥ| vāstukaḥ ṭaṅkavāstukaḥ| suniṣaṇṇakaḥ śirivālikā, catuṣparṇītyaparē| jīvantī ḍōḍikā| maṇḍūkaparṇī brāhmī| cillīprabhr̥tīni śākēṣu| gavyaṁ ghr̥taṁ snēhēṣu| saindhavaṁ lavaṇēṣu| āmalakadāḍimau phalēṣu| nanu, nīvārakōdravōddālakādīnāṁ vātakaratvādvātāhitatvaṁ syāt, tat kathaṁ hitānītyucyantē? naivam; alpavātakaratvādadōṣakaratvavyapadēśa iti||5||

Meaning of the commentary

Red shali is known by that name. Shashtika is the white variety, kanguka the white-black variety and mukundaka the black variety. Panduka shali has a pale husk. Sugandhaka is devashali. Kalama is a shali variety locally called kalavi. These belong among awned grains. Nivara is a red-awned grain among the prasadi group and is locally called tulaji. Uddalaka is wild kodrava, and vainava is bamboo barley; these and the related grains are placed among inferior or minor grains. Ena is blackbuck, harina a copper-coloured deer, kuranga is locally called caturanga, mrigamatrika is the small, broad-bellied female caturanga, shvadamshtra is a fierce four-tusked animal locally called karkataka, and karala is musk deer. Tittiri is the dark partridge and kapinjala the pale partridge. Vartira is locally called gharghara and vartika is its variety. The deer beginning with ena are dry-land animal meats, and the birds beginning with lava are dry-land birds. Mangalya is a pale variety of masura. Harenu is a round kalaya and a variety of satina. Adhaki is tuvari, and satina is round. Mudga and the following pulses belong to the pulse-soup group. Chilli is field vastuka; vastuka is tankavastuka. Sunishannaka is shirivalika, though others identify it as a four-leaved plant. Jivanti is dodika and mandukaparni is brahmi. These belong among leafy vegetables. Cow ghee represents unctuous substances, saindhava the salts, and amalaki and pomegranate the fruits. The commentary addresses the objection that nivara, kodrava and uddalaka can increase vata: because that action is slight, they are still described as not producing dosha disturbance.

Key terms

pathyatama
Classified by the source as most generally suitable or wholesome.
jA~ggala (jangala)
Associated with dry-land habitat, here classifying certain animal and bird meats.

Adhikarana 5 (6) · Śloka 6

tathā brahmacaryanivātaśayanōṣṇōdakasnānaniśāsvapnavyāyāmāścaikāntataḥ pathyatamāḥ ||6||

View original

तथा ब्रह्मचर्यनिवातशयनोष्णोदकस्नाननिशास्वप्नव्यायामाश्चैकान्ततः पथ्यतमाः ||६||

Meaning of the śloka

Likewise, celibacy or sexual restraint, sleeping in a place free from wind, bathing with warm water, sleeping at night and exercise are classed as consistently most suitable.

🔊 Audio coming soon

Hide commentary

āhāramaikāntikaṁ nirdiśya vihāraṁ nirdiśannāha- tathētyādi| brahmacaryaṁ strīsēvānivr̥ttiḥ| vyāyāmaḥ svasthasya mātrayā kālē ca pathyatamaḥ| vyāyāmāścēti cakārādvēgāvidhāraṇādīnāṁ grahaṇam||6||

Meaning of the commentary

After the dietary items, the text describes conduct. Brahmacarya here means abstaining from sexual relations. Exercise is considered most suitable for a healthy person when performed at the proper time and in an appropriate amount. The conjunction also includes conduct such as not suppressing natural urges.

Key terms

brahmacarya
Explained here specifically as abstention from sexual relations.

Adhikarana 6 (7) · Śloka 7

ēkāntahitānyēkāntāhitāni tu prāgupadiṣṭāni, hitāhitāni tu yadvāyōḥ pathyaṁ tat pittasyāpathyamiti ||7||

View original

एकान्तहितान्येकान्ताहितानि तु प्रागुपदिष्टानि, हिताहितानि तु यद्वायोः पथ्यं तत् पित्तस्यापथ्यमिति ||७||

Meaning of the śloka

The things invariably beneficial and invariably harmful have already been taught. Context-dependent things have also been indicated by the statement that what is suitable for vata may be unsuitable for pitta.

🔊 Audio coming soon

Hide commentary

ēkāntētyādi|- ēkāntahitāni salilādīni| ēkāntāhitāni agnyādīni; ētāni pūrvaṁ kathitāni| hitāhitāni tviti tuśabdaścārthē, tēna hitāhitāni ca prāgupadiṣṭāni| kāni punastāni hitāhitāni prāgupadiṣṭānītyāha- yadvāyōḥ pathyaṁ tat pittasyāpathyamiti||7||

Meaning of the commentary

The invariably beneficial items are water and the others, while the invariably harmful items are fire and the others. The conjunction shows that context-dependent items too were explained earlier, through the example of differing suitability for vata and pitta.

Adhikarana 7 (8) · Śloka 8

saṁyōgatastvaparāṇi viṣatulyāni bhavanti | tadyathā- vallīphalakavakakarīrāmlaphalalavaṇakulatthapiṇyākadadhitailavirōhipiṣṭaśuṣkaśākājāvikamāṁsamadyajāmbavacilicimamatsyagōdhāvarāhāṁśca naikadhyamaśnīyāt payasā ||8||

View original

संयोगतस्त्वपराणि विषतुल्यानि भवन्ति | तद्यथा- वल्लीफलकवककरीराम्लफललवणकुलत्थपिण्याकदधितैलविरोहिपिष्टशुष्कशाकाजाविकमांसमद्यजाम्बवचिलिचिममत्स्यगोधावराहांश्च नैकध्यमश्नीयात् पयसा ||८||

Meaning of the śloka

Other substances become comparable to poison through combination. Therefore milk should not be consumed at the same time with vine fruits, mushrooms, bamboo shoots, sour fruits, salt, kulattha, oil cake, curd, oil, virohi, rice-flour preparations, dried vegetables, goat or sheep meat, alcoholic drink, jambu fruit, cilicima fish, monitor lizard or boar meat, whether these are taken together as a group or individually.

🔊 Audio coming soon

Hide commentary

saṁyōgatastvityādi| viṣatulyānīti viṣatulyatvēnaikāntāhitatvamuktam| kutaḥ? svasthē viṣasyēkāntāhitatvāt| tānyēva darśayannāha- tadyathētyādi| vallīphalaṁ kūṣmāṇḍādivallījam, anyē śimbyādimāhuḥ; kavakaṁ chatrakaṁ, ‘chatrakabhēdaṁ sukhaṇḍakasañjñam’ ityanyē; karīrō vaṁśāṅkura; amlaphalāni āmrātakādīni; virōhi vigatarōhaṁ caṇakādikamaṅkuritaṁ ca; piṣṭaṁ taṇḍulapiṣṭaṁ; jāmbavaṁ jambūphalaṁ; cilicimamatsyaḥ śakalī lōhitākṣaḥ sarvatō lōhitarājiḥ prāyō bhūmau carati sthalamīnasañjñakaḥ | naikadhyaṁ naikasmin kālē| ētāni vallīphalādīni varāhāntāni samastavyastānyapi payasā saha nāśnīyāt| kēcidētasya vargasyāntē ‘ajāṅgalaṁ māṁsaṁ svasthānāmanyatra rōgōpasr̥ṣṭēbhyaḥ’ iti paṭhanti, vyākhyānayanti ca- ajāṅgalaṁ māṁsaṁ jalēśayānūpādibhēdēna pañcaprakāram||8||

Meaning of the commentary

Calling these combinations poison-like places them in the invariably harmful category within the source's framework, since poison is held to be invariably harmful to a healthy person. Valliphala means fruits of creepers such as kushmanda; others identify pulses and similar pods. Kavaka is mushroom; some specify a mushroom variety called sukhanda. Karira is a bamboo shoot, and sour fruits include amrataka. Virohi may mean something whose sprout has been removed or sprouted gram and similar foods. Pishta is rice flour, jambava is jambu fruit, and cilicima is described as a scaled, red-eyed fish with red lines over its body, usually moving on land and called a land fish. Naikadhyam means not at one time. Every item from vine fruit through boar is prohibited with milk both collectively and separately. Some recensions add that non-dry-land meat is suitable for healthy people except those affected by disease, and explain non-dry-land meat as fivefold according to aquatic, marshy and related habitats.

Key terms

viShatulya (vishatulya)
Compared to poison within the source's classification because of a particular combination.
cilicimamatsya
A fish described in the commentary as scaled, red-eyed, red-striped and commonly moving on land.

Adhikarana 8 (9) · Śloka 9

rōgaṁ sātmyaṁ ca dēśaṁ ca kālaṁ dēhaṁ ca buddhimān | avēkṣyāgnyādikān bhāvān rōgavr̥ttēḥ prayōjayēt ||9||

View original

रोगं सात्म्यं च देशं च कालं देहं च बुद्धिमान् | अवेक्ष्याग्न्यादिकान् भावान् रोगवृत्तेः प्रयोजयेत् ||९||

Meaning of the śloka

A discerning physician should examine the disease, habituation, region, season, bodily condition, digestive fire and other relevant factors, and then administer an appropriate substance to the patient.

🔊 Audio coming soon

Hide commentary

viruddhasyāpi kvacit prayōgaṁ darśayannāha- rōgamityādi| rōgam udarādikam| sātmyam aṣṭavidhaṁ jātyāturauṣadhānnarasadēśartūdakamēdataḥ | dēśamānūpādikam| kālaṁ śītōṣṇavarṣalakṣaṇam| dēhaṁ sthūlakr̥śamadhyabhēdabhinnam| agnyādikān bhāvāniti agnyādikān padārthān| ādiśabdāt prakr̥tivayōbalasattvādi gr̥hyatē| rōgavr̥ttēḥ rōgiṇa ityarthaḥ| ētēna buddhimānūhāpōhavitarkānugatadhīyuktō vaidyō rōgādīnavēkṣyaikāntāhitamapi rōgiṇaḥ prayōjayēditi| tadyathā- udariṇastilamātraviṣabhakṣaṇaṁ kr̥ṣṇasarpadaṣṭēkṣukāṇḍabhakṣaṇaṁ cētyādikaṁ bōddhavyam||9||

Meaning of the commentary

The passage shows that even something generally classed as incompatible may sometimes be used. Disease includes conditions such as abdominal enlargement. Satmya is said to be eightfold, based on species or birth group, patient, medicine, food, taste, region, season and water. Region includes marshy and other types; season is characterized by cold, heat or rain; and bodily condition may be stout, lean or intermediate. The factors beginning with digestive fire also include constitution, age, strength and mental resilience. Rogavrtti means the patient. Thus, a physician capable of inference, discrimination and reasoning may, after examining these factors, administer even a substance considered categorically harmful. The commentary gives historical examples involving a minute amount of poison in an abdominal disorder and sugarcane given after a black-snake bite.

Key terms

sAtmyam (satmyam)
Habituation or suitability considered through eight contextual bases listed by the commentary.
agnyAdikAn bhAvAn (agnyadikan bhavan)
Digestive fire and related patient factors such as constitution, age, strength and mental resilience.

Adhikarana 9 (10-12) · Śloka 12

avasthāntarabāhulyādrōgādīnāṁ vyavasthitam | dravyaṁ nēcchanti bhiṣaja icchanti svastharakṣaṇē ||10|| dvayōranyatarādānē vadanti viṣadugdhayōḥ | dugdhasyaikāntahitatāṁ viṣamēkāntatō'hitam ||11|| ēvaṁ yuktarasēṣvēṣu dravyēṣu salilādiṣu | ēkāntahitatāṁ viddhi vatsa suśruta nānyathā ||12||

View original

अवस्थान्तरबाहुल्याद्रोगादीनां व्यवस्थितम् | द्रव्यं नेच्छन्ति भिषज इच्छन्ति स्वस्थरक्षणे ||१०|| द्वयोरन्यतरादाने वदन्ति विषदुग्धयोः | दुग्धस्यैकान्तहिततां विषमेकान्ततोऽहितम् ||११|| एवं युक्तरसेष्वेषु द्रव्येषु सलिलादिषु | एकान्तहिततां विद्धि वत्स सुश्रुत नान्यथा ||१२||

Meaning of the śloka

Because diseases and the other relevant factors occur in many different states, physicians do not accept that a substance is invariably fixed as beneficial or harmful for a patient. They do, however, accept such a distinction for protecting a healthy person. When choosing between poison and milk for a healthy person, they describe milk as invariably beneficial and poison as invariably harmful. In the same way, Sushruta, understand water and other substances possessing properly combined tastes to be invariably beneficial for a healthy person, and not otherwise.

🔊 Audio coming soon

Hide commentary

tasmāddhitāhitatvēna vyavasthitaṁ dravyaṁ nāstītyāha- avasthāntarabāhulyādityādi| avasthāntarabāhulyāt avasthāviśēṣāṇāṁ prācuryāt| kēṣāmavasthāviśēṣā ityāha- rōgādīnām| ādiśabdāt sātmyadēśādīnāṁ grahaṇam| vyavasthitaṁ dravyaṁ nēcchantīti hitamēvēdamahitamēvēdamiti vaidyā nēcchanti, avasthāviśēṣabāhulyāt| kiṁ sarvatraiva vyavasthitaṁ dravyaṁ nēcchantītyāha- icchanti svastharakṣaṇa iti|- svastharakṣaṇē punarvyavasthitaṁ dravyaṁ vaidyā icchantyēvēti| amumēvārthaṁ darśayannāha- dvayōrityādi| dvayōḥ svastharōgiṇōḥ| anyatarādāna iti sāmānyōktāvapi svasthasyaiva grahaṇam| tēna viṣadugdhayōrmadhyē svasthē dugdhasyaikāntahitatāṁ bhiṣajō vadanti, viṣaṁ punarēkāntatō'hitamiti vadanti| ēvaṁ yuktarasēṣvēṣviti ēvamanēna svasthōpayōgaprakārēṇa| viddhi jānīhi| nānyathēti nāsvasthōpayōgaprakārēṇa||10-12||

Meaning of the commentary

The many possible states of disease, habituation, region and the other factors prevent physicians from calling a substance always beneficial or always harmful in every patient. They do accept fixed classifications in the context of preserving health. Although the example speaks generally of choosing for one of two people, the intended subject is the healthy person: for that person physicians call milk invariably beneficial and poison invariably harmful. Likewise, the concluding statement about water and other substances applies to their use by a healthy person, not to use by someone who is ill.

Key terms

avasthAntarabAhulyAt (avasthantarabahulyat)
Because disease and contextual factors have many differing states.
ekAntahitatA (ekantahitata)
The classification of something as invariably beneficial within the stated context of protecting health.

Adhikarana 10 (13) · Śloka 13

atō'nyānyapi saṁyōgādahitāni vakṣyāmaḥ- navavirūḍhadhānyairvasāmadhupayōguḍamāṣairvā grāmyānūpaudakapiśitādīni nābhyavaharēt; na payōmadhubhyāṁ rōhiṇīśākaṁ jātukaśākaṁ vā'śnīyāt, balākāṁ vāruṇīkulmāṣābhyāṁ, kākamācīṁ pippalīmaricābhyāṁ; nāḍībhaṅgaśākakukkuṭadadhīni ca naikadhyaṁ; madhu cōṣṇōdakānupānaṁ; pittēna cāmamāṁsāni; surākr̥śarāpāyasāṁśca naikadhyaṁ; sauvīrakēṇa saha tilaśaṣkulīṁ; matsyaiḥ sahēkṣuvikārān; guḍēna kākamācīṁ, madhunā mūlakaṁ, guḍēna vārāhaṁ madhunā ca saha viruddhaṁ; kṣīrēṇa mūlakam, āmrajāmbavaśvāvicchūkaragōdhāśca; sarvāṁśca matsyān payasā, viśēṣēṇa cilicimaṁ; kadalīphalaṁ tālaphalēna payasā dadhnā takrēṇa vā; lakucaphalaṁ payasā dadhnā māṣasūpēna vā, prāk payasaḥ payasō'ntē vā ||13||

View original

अतोऽन्यान्यपि संयोगादहितानि वक्ष्यामः- नवविरूढधान्यैर्वसामधुपयोगुडमाषैर्वा ग्राम्यानूपौदकपिशितादीनि नाभ्यवहरेत्; न पयोमधुभ्यां रोहिणीशाकं जातुकशाकं वाऽश्नीयात्, बलाकां वारुणीकुल्माषाभ्यां, काकमाचीं पिप्पलीमरिचाभ्यां; नाडीभङ्गशाककुक्कुटदधीनि च नैकध्यं; मधु चोष्णोदकानुपानं; पित्तेन चाममांसानि; सुराकृशरापायसांश्च नैकध्यं; सौवीरकेण सह तिलशष्कुलीं; मत्स्यैः सहेक्षुविकारान्; गुडेन काकमाचीं, मधुना मूलकं, गुडेन वाराहं मधुना च सह विरुद्धं; क्षीरेण मूलकम्, आम्रजाम्बवश्वाविच्छूकरगोधाश्च; सर्वांश्च मत्स्यान् पयसा, विशेषेण चिलिचिमं; कदलीफलं तालफलेन पयसा दध्ना तक्रेण वा; लकुचफलं पयसा दध्ना माषसूपेन वा, प्राक् पयसः पयसोऽन्ते वा ||१३||

Meaning of the śloka

The text next lists foods regarded as incompatible because of combination. Meat and related foods of domestic, marsh-dwelling and aquatic animals should not be eaten with newly sprouted grain, animal fat, honey, milk, jaggery or masha, whether these are taken together or separately. Rohini or jatuka greens should not be eaten with milk and honey; balaka with varuni and kulmasha; or kakamaci with pippali and marica. Nadibhanga greens, chicken and curd should not be combined. Honey should not be followed by hot water. Raw meats should not be eaten with pitta. Sura, krishara and payasa should not be combined with one another. Sesame shashkuli should not be taken with sauvira, fish with sugarcane products, kakamaci with jaggery, mulaka with honey, or boar with jaggery and honey. Mulaka, mango, jambu, shvavit, pig and godha are incompatible with milk, as are all fish, especially cilicima. Banana is not to be combined with tala fruit, milk, curd or buttermilk. Lakuca fruit is not to be combined with milk, curd or masha soup, nor eaten immediately before or after milk.

🔊 Audio coming soon

Hide commentary

atō'nyānyapītyādi| navavirūḍhadhānyairiti navavirūḍhadhānyādibhiḥ saha grāmyādīnāṁ māṁsādīni nāśnīyādityarthaḥ| navadhānyādibhiḥ samastairvyastairapi grāmyādīnāṁ piśitādīni viruddhānīti| virūḍhaṁ vigatāṅkuramaṅkuritaṁ ca| rōhiṇīśākaṁ kaṭukāśākam| jātukaśākaṁ pauṣkaraśākam| balākāṁ vāruṇīkulmāṣābhyāmiti balākā bakabhēdaḥ; vāruṇī madyāparaparyāyaḥ, kulmāṣa utsvinnamāṣādiḥ; ābhyāṁ saha balākāṁ nāśnīyāditi yōjyam| kākamācīmityādi pippalīmaricābhyāṁ saha kākamācīṁ nāśnīyāditi yōjanīyam| nāḍībhaṅgaśākaṁ nāḍīpallavaśākaṁ, kukkuṭastāmracūḍaḥ; ētāni dviśastriśō'pi vā nāśnīyāt| madhu cēti na hitamityarthaḥ| pittaṁ kālakhaṇḍalagnam| surā madyabhēdaḥ, kr̥śarā tilataṇḍulamāṣaiḥ kr̥tā yavāgūḥ, pāyasaṁ kṣīrasiddhāstaṇḍulāḥ amūnyapi triśō dviśō vā'pi viruddhāni| sauvīrakēṇēti sauvīrakaṁ kāñjikaviśēṣō virēcanādhikārē vakṣyatē| ikṣuvikārān guḍādīn| guḍēna kākamācīmityādi| anyē tvēvaṁ paṭhanti- ‘guḍēna kākamācīṁ, madhunā mūlakaṁ, vārāhaṁ kṣīrēṇa mūlakaṁ ca’ aparē tvēvaṁ paṭhanti- ‘guḍēna kākamācīṁ, madhunā mūlakaṁ, vārāhaṁ ca’; cakārāt ‘madhuna’ iti padaṁ vārāhēṇa kākamācyā ca saha sambadhnanti| āmrajāmbavētyādi ‘naikadhyamaśnīyāt’ iti vākyaśēṣaḥ| śvāvit sēhikā| sarvāṁśca matsyānityādi, nanu sarvāṁśca matsyān payasā’ ityanēnaiva cilicimamatsyavirōdhaḥ siddhaḥ tat kimarthaṁ vallīphalādiṣu cilicimatsyasya payasā virōdhapāṭha ityāha- viśēṣēṇa cilicimamiti| kadalīphalamityādi tālādibhiḥ saha kadalīphalaṁ nāśnīyādityarthaḥ| lakucētyādi dadhyādibhiḥ saha lakucaphalaṁ nāśnīyādityarthaḥ| kēcidatra ‘madhunā ghr̥tēna ca’ iti paṭhanti, lakucaphalaṁ nāśnīyāditi ca vyākhyānayanti| ayaṁ pāṭhō vartamānāsu bahuṣu pratiṣu paṭhyatē, na tu nibandhēṣu, tasmānna paṭhanīya iti| prāk payasaḥ payasō'ntē vēti ‘lakucaphalaṁ nāśnīyāt’ iti śēṣaḥ||13||

Meaning of the commentary

Both sprouted and de-sprouted new grain are included, and each named item is incompatible with the domestic and other meats whether used collectively or separately. Rohini is katuka greens and jatuka is paushkara greens. Balaka is a type of crane, varuni another name for liquor, and kulmasha boiled masha or similar grain. Nadibhanga is a green made from tender reed-like shoots, and chicken may be combined with neither one nor both of the other listed items. Pitta here means the dark portion attached to the liver. Krishara is gruel of sesame, rice and masha; payasa is rice cooked in milk; these and sura are incompatible in pairs as well as all three together. Sauvira is a type of sour fermented grain liquid. Sugarcane products include jaggery. Other witnesses read the sequence as kakamaci with jaggery, mulaka with honey, boar with milk, and mulaka with milk. Still others omit the milk relationship with boar and read kakamaci with jaggery, mulaka with honey, and boar; by carrying the word honey forward, they link it with both boar and kakamaci. Shvavit is identified as sehika. Cilicima is singled out to emphasize its incompatibility with milk even though all fish have already been included. Some manuscripts add a reading that lakuca should not be eaten with honey and ghee; although present in many current copies, it is absent from the older compilations and the commentator says it should not be accepted. The final phrase again supplies lakuca as the item not to be eaten before or after milk.

Key terms

saMyogAdahitAni (samyogadahitanI)
Foods classed by the source as harmful specifically because of their combination.
kRusharA (krishara)
A gruel prepared from sesame, rice and masha.
cilicimam
A fish singled out as especially incompatible with milk in the source.

Adhikarana 11 (14) · Śloka 14

ataḥ karmaviruddhān vakṣyāmaḥ- kapōtān sarṣapatailabhr̥ṣṭānnādyāt; kapiñjalamayūralāvatittirigōdhāścairaṇḍadārvyagnisiddhā ēraṇḍatailasiddhā vā nādyāt; kāṁsyabhājanē daśarātraparyuṣitaṁ sarpiḥ; madhu cōṣṇairuṣṇē vā; matsyaparipacanē śr̥ṅgavēraparipacanē vā siddhāṁ kākamācīṁ; tilakalkasiddhamupōdikāśākaṁ; nārikēlēna varāhavasāparibhr̥ṣṭāṁ balākāṁ; bhāsamaṅgāraśūlyaṁ nāśnīyāditi ||14||

View original

अतः कर्मविरुद्धान् वक्ष्यामः- कपोतान् सर्षपतैलभृष्टान्नाद्यात्; कपिञ्जलमयूरलावतित्तिरिगोधाश्चैरण्डदार्व्यग्निसिद्धा एरण्डतैलसिद्धा वा नाद्यात्; कांस्यभाजने दशरात्रपर्युषितं सर्पिः; मधु चोष्णैरुष्णे वा; मत्स्यपरिपचने शृङ्गवेरपरिपचने वा सिद्धां काकमाचीं; तिलकल्कसिद्धमुपोदिकाशाकं; नारिकेलेन वराहवसापरिभृष्टां बलाकां; भासमङ्गारशूल्यं नाश्नीयादिति ||१४||

Meaning of the śloka

The text next lists foods regarded as incompatible because of preparation. Pigeon fried in mustard oil should not be eaten. Kapinjala, peacock, lava, tittiri and godha should not be eaten when cooked over fuel of eranda wood and daruharidra, or cooked in eranda oil. Ghee kept for ten nights in a bronze vessel should not be consumed. Honey should not be taken with hot substances or in hot seasons. Kakamaci cooked in a vessel previously used to cook fish or ginger should not be eaten, nor upodika greens cooked with sesame paste, nor balaka fried in boar fat and eaten with coconut. Bhasa cooked on a spit over embers should also not be eaten.

🔊 Audio coming soon

Hide commentary

saṁyōgaviruddhānabhidhāya karmaviruddhān vaktumāha- ata ityādi| karmaśabdēnātra saṁskārō'bhiprētaḥ| ēraṇḍadārvyagnisiddhā iti ēraṇḍadāruharidrāgnisiddhāḥ; ‘ēraṇḍadārvagnisiddhā’ ityanyē paṭhanti, ‘ēraṇḍakāṣṭhavahninā siddhāḥ’ iti ca vyākhyānayanti| nādyāt na khādēt| daśarātraparyuṣitamiti daśaniśādināni nivāsitam| madhu cōṣṇairiti uṣṇairuṣṇasparśadravyaiḥ, uṣṇasparśatvaṁ cāgnyādijanitaṁ jñēyam| uṣṇē uṣṇakālē grīṣmē śaradi cētyarthaḥ| matsyaparipacana iti paripacanaṁ pātramucyatē| nārikēlēnētyādi varāhavasāparibhr̥ṣṭāṁ balākāṁ nārikēlēṇa saha nāśnīyādityarthaḥ| bhāsamiti bhāsō gr̥dhraviśēṣaḥ svalpatuṇḍō dhūsaravarṇaḥ| yacchūlēna viddhvā aṅgārēṣu pakvaṁ tadaṅgāraśūlyam||14||

Meaning of the commentary

Here karman means processing or preparation. The wording concerning eranda and daruharidra is read as cooking over a fire made from eranda and daruharidra wood. Others read only eranda-wood fire and explain it accordingly. Ten nights means that the ghee has remained for ten days and nights. Hot substances are those hot to the touch through fire or another cause, while a hot time means summer and autumn. In the fish- and ginger-cooking rule, paripacana means the cooking vessel. The balaka is forbidden with coconut after being fried in boar fat. Bhasa is described as a short-beaked gray kind of vulture, and angarashulya means pierced on a spit and cooked over embers.

Key terms

karmaviruddhAn (karmaviruddhan)
Foods regarded as incompatible because of their processing or method of preparation.
a~ggArashUlyam (angarashulyam)
Pierced on a spit and cooked over embers.

Adhikarana 12 (15) · Śloka 15

atō mānaviruddhān vakṣyāmaḥ- madhvambunī madhusarpiṣī mānatastulyē nāśnīyāt; snēhau madhusnēhau jalasnēhau vā viśēṣādāntarīkṣōdakānupānau ||15||

View original

अतो मानविरुद्धान् वक्ष्यामः- मध्वम्बुनी मधुसर्पिषी मानतस्तुल्ये नाश्नीयात्; स्नेहौ मधुस्नेहौ जलस्नेहौ वा विशेषादान्तरीक्षोदकानुपानौ ||१५||

Meaning of the śloka

The text next lists incompatibility due to quantity. Honey and water, and honey and ghee, should not be consumed in equal measures. Two unctuous substances, honey with an unctuous substance, or water with an unctuous substance should especially not be taken when rainwater is used as the accompanying drink.

🔊 Audio coming soon

Hide commentary

jalasnēhāvityādi āntarīkṣōdakānupānau viśēṣatō madhusnēhau jalasnēhau vā nāśnīyāt| tadēvaṁ svabhāvāpathyasaṁyōgakālasaṁskāramānaiḥ pañcaprakārāṇi viruddhāni nirdiṣṭāni||15||

Meaning of the commentary

The commentary emphasizes that honey with an unctuous substance, or water with an unctuous substance, is especially not to be consumed with rainwater as the accompanying drink. With this passage the source has described five forms of incompatibility: by inherent nature, combination, time, processing and quantity.

Key terms

mAnaviruddhAn (manaviruddhan)
Substances regarded as incompatible because of the quantities in which they are combined.
AntarIkShodakAnupAnau (antarikshodakanupanau)
Taken with rainwater as the accompanying drink.

Adhikarana 13 (16) · Śloka 16

ata ūrdhvaṁ rasadvandvāni rasatō vīryatō vipākataśca viruddhāni vakṣyāmaḥ- tatra madhurāmlau rasavīryaviruddhau, madhuralavaṇau ca, madhurakaṭukau ca sarvataḥ, madhuratiktau rasavipākābhyāṁ, madhurakaṣāyau ca, amlalavaṇau rasataḥ, amlakaṭukau rasavipākābhyām, amlatiktāvamlakaṣāyau ca sarvataḥ, lavaṇakaṭukau rasavipākābhyāṁ, lavaṇatiktau lavaṇakaṣāyau ca sarvataḥ, kaṭutiktau rasavīryābhyāṁ kaṭukaṣāyau ca, tiktakaṣāyau rasataḥ ||16||

View original

अत ऊर्ध्वं रसद्वन्द्वानि रसतो वीर्यतो विपाकतश्च विरुद्धानि वक्ष्यामः- तत्र मधुराम्लौ रसवीर्यविरुद्धौ, मधुरलवणौ च, मधुरकटुकौ च सर्वतः, मधुरतिक्तौ रसविपाकाभ्यां, मधुरकषायौ च, अम्ललवणौ रसतः, अम्लकटुकौ रसविपाकाभ्याम्, अम्लतिक्तावम्लकषायौ च सर्वतः, लवणकटुकौ रसविपाकाभ्यां, लवणतिक्तौ लवणकषायौ च सर्वतः, कटुतिक्तौ रसवीर्याभ्यां कटुकषायौ च, तिक्तकषायौ रसतः ||१६||

Meaning of the śloka

The text next classifies pairs of tastes as incompatible by taste, potency or post-digestive effect. Sweet and sour, and sweet and salty, are opposed by taste and potency. Sweet and pungent are opposed in all three respects. Sweet and bitter, and sweet and astringent, are opposed by taste and post-digestive effect. Sour and salty are opposed by taste. Sour and pungent are opposed by taste and post-digestive effect. Sour with bitter, and sour with astringent, are opposed in all three respects. Salty and pungent are opposed by taste and post-digestive effect. Salty with bitter, and salty with astringent, are opposed in all three respects. Pungent with bitter, and pungent with astringent, are opposed by taste and potency. Bitter and astringent are opposed by taste.

🔊 Audio coming soon

Hide commentary

ata ūrdhvamityādi| madhuralavaṇau cēti cakārēṇa rasavīryaviruddhāviti samuccīyatē| sarvata iti rasavīryavipākataḥ; ēvaṁ sarvatra rasadvandvaprakaraṇē sarvataḥśabdō vyākhyātavyaḥ| madhurakaṣāyau cēti cakārēṇa imāvapi rasavipākābhyāṁ viruddhāviti samuccīyatē| kaṭukaṣāyau cēti cakārādētāvapi rasavīryābhyāṁ viruddhāviti| madhurāmlāvityādipāṭhēna dadhiśarkarādidvandvēṣūpayōgārhēṣu na virōdhaḥ, anyēṣu cānūpayōgārhēṣu virōdha iti sūcitam| śrīgayadāsādaya ācāryā amuṁ pāṭhamanārṣaṁ varṇayanti; kasmāt? ‘ādau madhuramaśrnīyāt’ (sū. a.46) ityādinā sarvarasābhyavahārasya svasthānāmuktatvāt, ‘na caikarasasēvāyāṁ’ ityādinā caikarasasēvāyā niṣiddhatvāt; tasmānna paṭhanīya ēvāyaṁ grantha iti| śrībrahmadēvastvārṣānārṣacintāmakurvannamuṁ granthaṁ paṭhati vyākhyānayati ca| tatpaṭhitavyākhyātvāt sarvamatadarśibhirasmābhirapi likhitaḥ kvacidvyākhyātaścēti||16||

Meaning of the commentary

In this section, 'in all respects' means by taste, potency and post-digestive effect. The conjunction after sweet and salty carries forward opposition by taste and potency; after sweet and astringent it carries forward opposition by taste and post-digestive effect; and after pungent and astringent it carries forward opposition by taste and potency. The passage implies that the listed opposition does not prohibit established usable pairs such as curd with sugar, but applies among pairs that are otherwise unsuitable. Gayadasa and other teachers declare this entire passage non-authoritative. They reason that another passage prescribes consuming all tastes, beginning with sweet, for healthy people, while yet another prohibits consuming only a single taste. Brahmadeva, without deciding whether it is authoritative, reads and explains it. The present commentator includes it, and explains portions of it, in order to represent all views.

Key terms

rasadvandvAni (rasadvandvani)
Pairs of tastes evaluated for opposition by taste, potency and post-digestive effect.
sarvataH (sarvatah)
In all three respects: taste, potency and post-digestive effect.

Adhikarana 14 (17) · Śloka 17

taratamayōgayuktāṁśca bhāvānatisnigdhānatirūkṣānatyuṣṇānatiśītānityēvamādīn vivarjayēt ||17||

View original

तरतमयोगयुक्तांश्च भावानतिस्निग्धानतिरूक्षानत्युष्णानतिशीतानित्येवमादीन् विवर्जयेत् ||१७||

Meaning of the śloka

Substances possessing qualities in excessive degrees should be avoided, including those that are excessively unctuous, dry, hot or cold, and other similar extremes.

🔊 Audio coming soon

Hide commentary

atiśayaguṇayōgayuktā māhiṣakṣīrādipadārthā hitā api svasthānāmēkāntāhitā bhavantīti darśayannāha- taratamētyādi| taratamayōgayuktāṁśca bhāvāniti atiśayasnēhādiguṇasahitāni dravyāṇītyarthaḥ| tānēvātiśayaguṇayuktān vivr̥ṇvannāha- atisnigdhānityādi| tasmānmāhiṣaṁ dugdhaṁ gavyādatiśayasnigdhaṁ svasthasya samāgnērvarjyam, asvasthasya ca tīkṣṇāgnēḥ sēvyamityādi draṣṭavyam| yuktāṁścēti cakārō'tiśayaguṇayuktānāmapi pathyatamāyuṣyatamavr̥ṣyatamānāṁ sēvanaṁ samuccinōti, ēṣāmēkāntahitatvāt; ēbhyō'nyē'tiśayaguṇayuktāḥ svābhāvādēvaikāntāhitā iti| ēvamādīnityādiśabdādanyē'pi vīryasañjñakā guṇāḥ picchilaviśadatīkṣṇamr̥davō gr̥hyantē, tathā gurulaghuvīryaṁ ca| anyē tu ‘ādiśabdāduktēbhyō'nyē'pi sarvē guṇā gr̥hyantē’ iti vadanti||17||

Meaning of the commentary

The verse explains that even substances normally beneficial to a healthy person, such as buffalo milk, become categorically harmful when a quality is excessive. Taratamayogayukta means endowed with an extreme degree of unctuousness or another quality. Thus buffalo milk, being more unctuous than cow milk, is to be avoided by a healthy person with balanced digestive fire, though the commentary says it may be used by an ill person with sharp digestive fire. The conjunction is also understood to include use of substances that are exceptionally wholesome, life-promoting or fertility-promoting, since these are held to be invariably beneficial; other substances possessing extreme qualities are held inherently and invariably harmful. 'And similar' includes qualities associated with potency such as slimy, clear or non-slimy, penetrating and soft, as well as heavy and light potency. Others say it includes every quality not already mentioned.

Key terms

taratamayogayuktAn (taratamayogayuktan)
Possessing a quality such as unctuousness, dryness, heat or cold to an excessive degree.

Adhikarana 15 (18) · Śloka 18

bhavanti cātra- viruddhānyēvamādīni vīryatō yāni kānicit | tānyēkāntāhitānyēva śēṣaṁ vidyāddhitāhitam ||18||

View original

भवन्ति चात्र- विरुद्धान्येवमादीनि वीर्यतो यानि कानिचित् | तान्येकान्ताहितान्येव शेषं विद्याद्धिताहितम् ||१८||

Meaning of the śloka

Items such as those described as incompatible because of their virya are invariably harmful. The remaining items should be understood as beneficial in some circumstances and harmful in others.

🔊 Audio coming soon

Hide commentary

amumēvārthaṁ sukhabōdhārthaṁ saṅgr̥hyāha- viruddhānītyādi| vīryata iti vīryaśabdēnātra snigdhādayō'ṣṭau guṇā ucyantē; athavā viṁśatiguṇāḥ ṣaḍrasā apyucyantē, ‘yēna kurvanti tadvīryam’ (sū. a.41) iti vacanāt| ēvamādīnītyuktē yāni kāniciditi yat kr̥taṁ tattantrāntarōktāśēṣaviruddhōpagrahārtham| anyē tvādiśabdāttantrāntarōktāni dēśakālamātrādiviruddhāni labhyanta iti manyantē| śēṣam atō'nyanmāṣādi hitāhitaṁ jānīyāt, kasyaciddōṣasya prakōpatvāt kasyaciddōṣasya haratvāditi||18||

Meaning of the commentary

The verse summarizes the preceding teaching. Virya may denote the eight qualities beginning with unctuousness, or the twenty qualities together with the six tastes, since virya is defined as that by which a substance acts. The broad wording includes all incompatibilities stated in other treatises. Another interpretation derives from 'and so forth' the incompatibilities involving place, time, quantity and other factors taught elsewhere. Remaining foods, such as masha, are conditionally beneficial or harmful because they aggravate one dosha while reducing another.

Key terms

vIryataH (viryatah)
On account of operative qualities; interpreted as the eight principal qualities or more broadly the twenty qualities and six tastes.

Adhikarana 16 (19) · Śloka 19

vyādhimindriyadaurbalyaṁ maraṇaṁ cādhigacchati | viruddharasavīryāṇi bhuñjānō'nātmavānnaraḥ ||19||

View original

व्याधिमिन्द्रियदौर्बल्यं मरणं चाधिगच्छति | विरुद्धरसवीर्याणि भुञ्जानोऽनात्मवान्नरः ||१९||

Meaning of the śloka

An undiscerning person who consumes substances having incompatible tastes and viryas incurs disease, weakness of the senses and death.

🔊 Audio coming soon

Hide commentary

kiṁ punarviruddhaṁ bhuktaṁ karōtītyāha- vyādhimityādi| vyādhimiti ṣāṇḍyāndhyavisarpadakōdaravisphōṭakōnmādabhagandarādikama , indriyadaurbalyam indriyādhiṣṭhānadaurbalyamindriyaśaktidaurbalyaṁ vā, adhigacchati prāpnōti| viruddharasavīryāṇi bhuñjāna iti rasagrahaṇaṁ dravyavīryaparihārārthaṁ, tēnōṣṇasyāpi dugdhasya prayōgō bhavati; kṣīradravyasya hyuṣṇatvaṁ tadgatamadhurarasaśaityēna virōdhinā'pi na duṣyati, ēvamuṣṇapānīyasyāpīti| anātmavān abuddhimān| anyē ‘rasavīryādīn’ iti paṭhanti| tēṣāṁ matē vipākayōrapi gurulaghusañjñayōrvirōdhō varjanīya iti| pūrvapratipāditādhyāyārthapiṇḍadarśanaparaḥ ślōkō'yaṁ; tēnāsminnadhyāya ēva yāni viruddhāni dravyāṇyuktāni tēṣvēva rasavīryavirōdhō jñēyō, na punarihānuktāni yāni tēṣviti||19||

Meaning of the commentary

The diseases named as examples include impotence, blindness, visarpa, dakodara, eruptions, insanity and bhagandara. Weakness may affect the physical seats of the senses or their functional powers. Mention of taste excludes treating the inherent virya of a substance itself as the incompatibility; thus the commentary allows warmed milk, explaining that the acquired heat does not make milk harmful because milk's sweet taste and cooling virya oppose it, and similarly allows warm water. An alternative reading has 'taste, virya and the others,' which also requires avoiding incompatibility of the two vipakas called heavy and light. The verse summarizes this chapter: the taste and virya incompatibility applies specifically to the substances declared incompatible here, rather than automatically to unlisted substances.

Key terms

indriyadaurbalyam
Weakness either of the bodily seats of the senses or of their sensory powers.

Adhikarana 17 (20) · Śloka 20

yatkiñciddōṣamutklēśya bhuktaṁ kāyānna nirharēt | rasādiṣvayathārthaṁ vā tadvikārāya kalpatē ||20||

View original

यत्किञ्चिद्दोषमुत्क्लेश्य भुक्तं कायान्न निर्हरेत् | रसादिष्वयथार्थं वा तद्विकाराय कल्पते ||२०||

Meaning of the śloka

Anything eaten that aggravates a dosha but does not expel it upward or downward, or that acts improperly upon rasa and the other dhatus, becomes a cause of disorder.

🔊 Audio coming soon

Hide commentary

na kēvalaṁ viruddhabhōjanamēva vyādhihētuḥ, api tu hitāhitādīnyapīti darśayannāha- yadityādi| yatkiñcidityanēna aśēṣamēvāhitaṁ saṅgr̥hītam| dōṣaṁ vātādikam| utklēśya prakōpya| na nirharēditi madanaphalatrivr̥tādivadūrdhvamadhō vā nākarṣēt, tadvikārāya kalpata iti sambandhanīyam; kalpatē sampadyatē| na kēvalaṁ dōṣakaramēva vyādhayē bhavati, api tu rasādidhātuduṣṭikaramapi vyādhayē bhavatītyāha- rasādiṣvityādi| rasādiṣvayathārthaṁ vēti rasādidhātuṣvayathārthaṁ prayōjanaviruddhaṁ rasādīnāṁ jīvanādiprayōjanavirōdhi rasādidhātudūṣaṇakaramityarthaḥ| dōṣaduṣṭikāritvēna dhātudūṣaṇakaratvaṁ na labhyatē, viśiṣṭaśaktitvāddravyāṇāṁ; tathāhi- kāniciddōṣaduṣṭikarāṇi, kāniciddhātuduṣṭikarāṇīti; tāni cātra na kathayiṣyāmō vistarabhayāt| anyē tu vyākhyānayanti- rasādiṣviti ādiśabdādvīryavipākayōrgrahaṇaṁ; tēna rasavīryavipākēṣu yadbhuktaṁ sadayathārthamanarthakaraṁ vā bhavati, tadvikārasya kalpatē| jaijjhaṭācāryastvamuṁ ślōkamanārṣaṁ kathayati, gayadāsācāryēṇa cāyamaṅgīkr̥taḥ, atō'smābhirapi likhitō vyākhyātaśca||20||

Meaning of the commentary

The verse shows that incompatible food is not the only cause of disease; conditionally beneficial or harmful foods may also cause it. 'Anything' includes every unsuitable substance. Utkleshya means aggravating vata or another dosha. Failure to expel means that, unlike madanaphala or trivrit, it does not draw the dosha upward or downward. A substance can also cause disease by specifically impairing rasa and the other dhatus and opposing their life-supporting purposes. Because substances have specific powers, some chiefly impair doshas and others dhatus; the details are omitted to avoid excessive length. Another explanation takes 'rasa and the others' to mean rasa, virya and vipaka: food that acts improperly or harmfully in any of these respects causes disorder. Jejjata calls the verse non-authoritative, while Gayadasa accepts it; Dalhana therefore records and explains it.

Key terms

utkleshya
Having excited or aggravated a dosha without subsequently expelling it.

Adhikarana 18 (21) · Śloka 21

viruddhāśanajān rōgān pratihanti virēcanam | vamanaṁ śamanaṁ vā'pi pūrvaṁ vā hitasēvanam ||21||

View original

विरुद्धाशनजान् रोगान् प्रतिहन्ति विरेचनम् | वमनं शमनं वाऽपि पूर्वं वा हितसेवनम् ||२१||

Meaning of the śloka

Disorders arising from incompatible food are countered by purgation, emesis or shamana, or by prior use of beneficial substances.

🔊 Audio coming soon

Hide commentary

viruddhāśanādutpannānāṁ rōgāṇāṁ cikitsāsūtramuddiśannāha- viruddhāśanajānityādi| pratihanti virēcanamiti viruddhāśanajavyādhipratyanīkaṁ virēcanaṁ pratiśabdēna dyōtyatē; tēna kuṣṭhavyādhipratyanīkaṁ virēcanaṁ viruddhāśanajaṁ kuṣṭhaṁ hanti, ēvamanyatrāpi yōjanīyam| vamanaṁ śamanaṁ vā'pīti tatra virēkavamanē bahudōṣāṇāṁ prāṇavatāṁ ca, itarēṣāṁ tu śamanamiti| śamanalakṣaṇamucyatē- “na śōdhayati yaddōṣān samānnōdīrayatyapi| samīkarōti kruddhāṁśca tat saṁśamanamucyatē”- iti| pūrvaṁ vā hitasēvanamiti suvarṇalōhādivirōdhirōgaharaṁ pūrvamēva sēvēta| taduktaṁ “na sajjatē hēmapāṅgē viṣaṁ padmadalē'mbuvat” (ca. ci. a. 23)| ‘pūrvaṁ vā hitabhōjanam’ ityanyē paṭhanti||21||

Meaning of the commentary

The purgation should be appropriate to the particular disease caused by incompatible food; for example, purgation suited to kushtha counters kushtha arising in this way, and the principle applies similarly elsewhere. Emesis or purgation is used when doshas are abundant and the patient has adequate vitality; shamana is for other cases. Shamana is defined as that which neither expels balanced doshas nor excites them, but brings aggravated doshas toward balance. Prior beneficial use means first taking something that counters the expected harmful disorder, with gold cited in relation to poison. Another reading has 'prior wholesome food' instead of 'prior beneficial use.'

Key terms

shamanam
A pacifying measure that brings aggravated doshas toward balance without expelling them or disturbing balanced doshas.

Adhikarana 19 (22) · Śloka 22

sātmyatō'lpatayā vā'pi dīptāgnēstaruṇasya ca | snigdhavyāyāmabalināṁ viruddhaṁ vitathaṁ bhavēt ||22||

View original

सात्म्यतोऽल्पतया वाऽपि दीप्ताग्नेस्तरुणस्य च | स्निग्धव्यायामबलिनां विरुद्धं वितथं भवेत् ||२२||

Meaning of the śloka

An incompatible substance may fail to produce its expected harmful effect when it has become habitual, is taken in a small quantity, or is consumed by a young person with strong agni and by those made strong through unctuous intake and exercise.

🔊 Audio coming soon

Hide commentary

viruddhāśanaṁ kurvatō'pi kasyacit kutō viruddhāśanajā dōṣā na bhavantītyāha- sātmyata ityādi| sātmyādibhirhētubhirviruddhaṁ vitathaṁ niṣphalaṁ bhavatīti piṇḍārthaḥ| snigdhavyāyāmabalināmiti snigdhavyāyāmābhyāṁ balināmiti sambadhyatē| tēnāyamarthaḥ- snigdhadravyābhyavahārabalināṁ balavadagnitvādviruddhaṁ niṣphalaṁ bhavati| kēcit ‘balinām’ iti padaṁ bhinnaṁ manyantē| tēnāyamarthaḥ- snigdhānāṁ vyāyāmināṁ balināṁ ca viruddhaṁ vitathaṁ bhavēditi| sātmyatō'lpatayētyādiślōkasyāgrē kēcidamuṁ ślōkaṁ paṭhanti- “vyāyāmaśīlō balavān śiśuśca snigdhō'gnimāṁścāpi mahāśanaśca| āpnōti rōgānna viruddhajātānabhyāsatō vā'lpatayā ca jantuḥ” iti; ayaṁ ca na paṭhanīyaḥ, sarvanibandhakārairapaṭhitatvāt||22||

Meaning of the commentary

The verse explains why some people who consume incompatible food do not develop the corresponding disorders. One grammatical interpretation joins strength with unctuous intake and exercise: persons strengthened by eating unctuous substances have powerful agni, so the incompatible food proves ineffective. Others take balinam as a separate group, yielding people who are unctuous, exercise regularly, or are strong. Some place after this verse another stanza saying that one accustomed to exercise, strong, a child, unctuous, possessing agni, or a large eater does not acquire such disorders because of habituation or small quantity. The commentary rejects that additional stanza because none of the commentators read it.

Key terms

sAtmyataH (satmyatah)
Because the substance has become compatible through habituation.

Adhikarana 20 (23-29) · Śloka 29

atha vātaguṇān vakṣyāmaḥ- pūrvaḥ samadhuraḥ snigdhō lavaṇaścaiva mārutaḥ | gururvidāhajananō raktapittābhivardhanaḥ ||23|| kṣatānāṁ viṣajuṣṭānāṁ vraṇinaḥ ślēṣmalāśca yē | tēṣāmēva viśēṣēṇa sadā rōgavivardhanaḥ ||24|| vātalānāṁ praśastaśca śrāntānāṁ kaphaśōṣiṇām | madhuraścāvidāhī ca kaṣāyānurasō laghuḥ | dakṣiṇō mārutaḥ śrēṣṭhaścakṣuṣyō balavardhanaḥ ||25|| raktapittapraśamanō na ca vātaprakōpaṇaḥ | viśadō rūkṣaparuṣaḥ kharaḥ snēhabalāpahaḥ ||26|| paścimō mārutastīkṣṇaḥ kaphamēdōviśōṣaṇaḥ | sadyaḥ prāṇakṣayakaraḥ śōṣaṇastu śarīriṇām ||27|| uttarō mārutaḥ snigdhō mr̥durmadhura ēva ca | kaṣāyānurasaḥ śītō dōṣāṇāṁ cāprakōpaṇaḥ ||28|| tasmācca prakr̥tisthānāṁ klēdanō balavardhanaḥ | kṣīṇakṣayaviṣārtānāṁ viśēṣēṇa tu pūjitaḥ ||29||

View original

अथ वातगुणान् वक्ष्यामः- पूर्वः समधुरः स्निग्धो लवणश्चैव मारुतः | गुरुर्विदाहजननो रक्तपित्ताभिवर्धनः ||२३|| क्षतानां विषजुष्टानां व्रणिनः श्लेष्मलाश्च ये | तेषामेव विशेषेण सदा रोगविवर्धनः ||२४|| वातलानां प्रशस्तश्च श्रान्तानां कफशोषिणाम् | मधुरश्चाविदाही च कषायानुरसो लघुः | दक्षिणो मारुतः श्रेष्ठश्चक्षुष्यो बलवर्धनः ||२५|| रक्तपित्तप्रशमनो न च वातप्रकोपणः | विशदो रूक्षपरुषः खरः स्नेहबलापहः ||२६|| पश्चिमो मारुतस्तीक्ष्णः कफमेदोविशोषणः | सद्यः प्राणक्षयकरः शोषणस्तु शरीरिणाम् ||२७|| उत्तरो मारुतः स्निग्धो मृदुर्मधुर एव च | कषायानुरसः शीतो दोषाणां चाप्रकोपणः ||२८|| तस्माच्च प्रकृतिस्थानां क्लेदनो बलवर्धनः | क्षीणक्षयविषार्तानां विशेषेण तु पूजितः ||२९||

Meaning of the śloka

The qualities of winds are now described. The east wind is slightly sweet, unctuous and saline, heavy, produces vidaha and increases rakta and pitta. It especially increases disease in wounded persons, those with injuries or poisoning, and those dominated by kapha. It is praised for people with vata conditions, fatigue or depleted kapha. The south wind is sweet, non-burning, light and has an astringent secondary taste; it is considered the best, beneficial to the eyes, strengthening, calming to rakta and pitta, and does not aggravate vata. The west wind is clear, dry, rough, forceful and removes unctuousness and strength; it is sharp, dries kapha and medas, depletes the body and may rapidly destroy vitality. The north wind is unctuous, soft, sweet, cooling and has an astringent secondary taste, without aggravating the doshas. It moistens and strengthens those in their normal state and is especially valued for people who are debilitated, depleted or afflicted by poison.

🔊 Audio coming soon

Hide commentary

hitasyāpi vātasya diksaṁyōgādahitatvaṁ syāditi vātaguṇān nirdiśannāha- atha vātaguṇān vakṣyāma ityādi| “vātasya dakṣiṇōttaragatasya dōṣaharatvēna hitatvaṁ, pūrvapaścimavātasyāhitatvam, atō hitāhitīyādhyāyaparisamāptau vātasya guṇōpavarṇanaṁ nirdēṣṭumāha- atha vātaguṇānityādi” ityanyē| ‘tēṣāmēva viśēṣēṇa vraṇaklēdavivardhanaḥ’ ityanyē paṭhanti| kharaḥ pracaṇḍavēgaḥ| anyē tvāhāradravyaprakaraṇāditarasaṁyōgō'prastuta ityamuṁ vātaguṇōpavarṇanagranthaṁ na paṭhantyēva| gayadāsācāryastvasmin hitāhitīyādhyāyapāṭhē pūrvōktaṁ pāṭhaṁ kiyantaṁ parityajyānyaṁ ca pāṭhaṁ kiyantaṁ nikṣipya pūrvōktapāṭhakramavyatikramēṇa ca paṭhati| yāvatā pāṭhēna vyatikramastāvantaṁ darśayannāha- “vallīphalakavakakarīrāmlaphalalavaṇakulatthapiṇyākadadhitilatailavirōdhi- śuṣkaśākājāvikamāṁsamadyajāmbavacilicimamatsyagōdhāvarāhāṁśca naikadhyamaśnīyāt payasā, prāk payasō'ntē vā| kapōtāṁśca sarṣapatailabhr̥ṣṭānnādyāt| kapiñjalamayūralāvatittirigōdhāścairaṇḍadārvya(rva)gnisiddhā ēraṇḍatailasiddhā vā| madhughr̥tē samadhr̥tē| madhu cāntarīkṣōdakānupānam| kāṁsyabhājanē daśarātraparyuṣitaṁ sarpiḥ| madhu cōṣṇamuṣṇēna vā| dadhi madyaṁ vā| pittēna saha māṁsāni pakvāni, āmāni ca kēvalānyapi| surākr̥śarāpāyasāṁśca naikadhyamaśnīyāt| sauvīrakēṇa saha tilaśaṣkulīḥ| takrēṇa saha madhughr̥tamatsyagōdhāpr̥ṣatamāṁsāni | madhunā gōdhām| matsyān kṣaudrāsavēna, pr̥ṣatamāṁsaṁ vā tēnaiva| tathā mairēyamādhvīkābhyāṁ bālōpōdakyā vā matsyān| nēkṣuvikr̥tīḥ sarvā matsyaiḥ saha| sarpirguḍakākamācīmadhumūlakāni naikadhyam | madhunā vārāhaṁ, dadhnā kaukkuṭaṁ, madyēna balākāṁ, tilakalkēna cōpōdikāṁ siddhām| na pippalīṁ matsyavasayā, priyaṅgvanuliptō na pāyasamaśnīyāt iti| asyāgrē ca ‘taratamayōgayuktāṁśca bhāvān’ ityādisūtrāṇi paṭhati, tāni ca pūrvasūtrairēva samānānīti nēha pradarśitāni||23-29||

Meaning of the commentary

The directions can make even otherwise beneficial wind harmful. Another explanation says south and north winds are beneficial because they reduce doshas, while east and west winds are harmful, which is why their qualities conclude the chapter. A variant says the east wind especially increases moisture in wounds rather than disease. Khara means violently forceful. Other authorities omit the entire wind passage because conjunction with direction is out of place in a discussion of foods. Gayadasa transmits this chapter in a different order, omitting some earlier material and inserting another list of incompatible combinations. That list prohibits taking milk together with, immediately before or after, vine fruits, fungi, karira, sour fruits, salt, kulattha, oil cake, curd, sesame oil, dry vegetables, goat or sheep meat, alcohol, jambu, chilichima fish, monitor lizard or boar. It also prohibits pigeon fried in mustard oil; kapinjala, peacock, lava, tittiri or monitor lizard cooked with castor wood or fire, or with castor oil; equal measures of honey and ghee; honey followed by rainwater; ghee kept ten nights in a bronze vessel; heated honey or honey with something hot; curd with alcohol; meat cooked with bile, and raw meat even alone; sura, krishara and payasa together; sesame cakes with sauvira; honey, ghee, fish, monitor lizard or prishata meat with buttermilk; monitor lizard with honey; fish or prishata meat with kshaudrasava; fish with maireya, madhvika or balopodaki; sugarcane products with fish; ghee, jaggery, kakamachi, honey and radish together; boar with honey; chicken with curd; balaka with alcohol; cooked upodika with sesame paste; pippali with fish fat; and eating payasa while anointed with priyangu. Gayadasa then places passages beginning with graded combinations, which the commentary does not reproduce because they match earlier passages.

Key terms

mArutaH (marutah)
Wind, whose qualities are classified here according to its direction.

Adhikarana puṣpikā · Śloka 20

iti suśrutasaṁhitāyāṁ sūtrasthānē hitāhitīyō nāma viṁśō'dhyāyaḥ ||20||

View original

इति सुश्रुतसंहितायां सूत्रस्थाने हिताहितीयो नाम विंशोऽध्यायः ||२०||

Meaning of the śloka

Thus ends the twentieth chapter, called Hitahitiya, in the Sutrasthana of the Sushruta Samhita.

🔊 Audio coming soon

Hide commentary

iti śrīḍalha(hla)ṇaviracitāyāṁ nibandhasaṅgrahākhyāyāṁ suśrutavyākhyāyāṁ sūtrasthānē viṁśatitamō'dhyāyaḥ||20||

Meaning of the commentary

Thus ends the twentieth chapter in the Sutrasthana of the Nibandhasangraha commentary on Sushruta, composed by Shri Dalhana.